Know what to automate before you pay to build it
Every workflow your team runs by hand, written down, timed and priced at what it costs a month. Then a roadmap ordered by return, so the first thing you build is the one that pays for the second.
$290 once, credited in full against any build. Back in 3 to 5 days. No retainer, no lock-in.
- Order to fulfilment handoff
- $3,400/mo
- Weekly reporting pack
- $2,900/mo
- Content production
- $2,750/mo
- Four more, refunds included
- $4,510/mo
- Supplier onboarding, left alone
- $640/mo
- Eight workflows
- $14,200/mo
Illustrative model, not a client result or forecast. The last row is deliberately left manual.
Three places worth measuring first
Recurring manual work often disappears into ordinary operations. The audit records the time and frequency before recommending a build.
The same task, every week, forever
Someone moves data between two tools by hand, rebuilds the same report every Monday, or answers the same twenty requests. Nobody logs it, because it is not a project. It is just how it is done.
Nobody knows what the manual version costs
Ask how long an invoice approval takes end to end and you get an estimate. The audit does not estimate: it times the steps, prices them at the loaded hourly rate, and multiplies by frequency.
The budget lands on the wrong workflow first
The most annoying process is rarely the most expensive one. Building the wrong thing first is how an automation budget produces a working system and no saving at all.
One document, four parts
Written so a developer who has never spoken to us can understand the workflow, the assumptions and the proposed build.
A modeled audit, with the working shown
This fictional scenario demonstrates the calculation. Its inputs and outputs are examples, not client results, averages or forecasts.
What it is, and what it is not
An audit that ends in a proposal for itself is a sales call with a document attached.
- Documents every workflow end to end, handoffs and waiting time included
- Times each step and prices it at your loaded hourly rate
- Ranks automation targets by return against build effort
- Names the workflows that are cheaper left alone, and why
- Flags integration problems before anything is quoted
- Build anything: that is quoted separately, and only if you want it
- Require you to build with us for the document to be useful
- Measure whether an AI assistant names you, which is a separate audit
- Bill by the hour or move once the scope is agreed
- Need meetings: the whole thing runs in writing
One field, then a card
No call and no proposal. Tell us which company to look at and pay for it; the audit is written against that business and comes back in three to five days.
Paid once. The full $290 comes off the first invoice if you go on to build with us.
Twenty minutes from you, five days from us
Asynchronous end to end. The only fixed cost on your side is the intake form.
What your team does by hand
Hours, costs and a ranked plan for removing them. The audit for a business that already has customers and is drowning in the work of serving them.
What an AI says about you
Twenty to forty buying prompts across four assistants, scored, with the sources they cite mapped. The audit for a business that needs the customers in the first place.
See the visibility auditBefore you book
Price, deliverable, what happens to your stack and your data, and what the other audit is.
Count it before you automate it.
Twenty minutes of writing, five days of work, and a document that tells you which workflow to fix first and what it is worth. If the honest answer is none of them, it says that too.
$290 · credited against any build · no retainer