Quick answers

AIGrow provides AI visibility monitoring, a business assistant, blog publishing and scoped automation services. Start with the free scan to inspect the output before paying.

Run the free scan

The scan is free and monitoring plans start at $29 a month. The operations audit is $290, the visibility audit is $490, and custom builds receive a written price before work starts.

See the plans

Run the free scan. It reads your site, asks several AI assistants what your customers ask, and points you at one thing. No signup required, and it will tell you if you do not need us.

Start now

Yes. Use the contact form for product, billing, support or project questions. Describe the goal and the system involved so the first reply can be specific.

Contact AIGrow
AI audit

Know what to automate before you pay to build it

Every workflow your team runs by hand, written down, timed and priced at what it costs a month. Then a roadmap ordered by return, so the first thing you build is the one that pays for the second.

$290 once, credited in full against any build. Back in 3 to 5 days. No retainer, no lock-in.

Process inventory, extract
$14,200modeled monthly cost across eight manual workflows
Order to fulfilment handoff
$3,400/mo
Weekly reporting pack
$2,900/mo
Content production
$2,750/mo
Four more, refunds included
$4,510/mo
Supplier onboarding, left alone
$640/mo
Eight workflows
$14,200/mo

Illustrative model, not a client result or forecast. The last row is deliberately left manual.

Three patterns

Three places worth measuring first

Recurring manual work often disappears into ordinary operations. The audit records the time and frequency before recommending a build.

Weeklyand never on a timesheet

The same task, every week, forever

Someone moves data between two tools by hand, rebuilds the same report every Monday, or answers the same twenty requests. Nobody logs it, because it is not a project. It is just how it is done.

Per taskmeasured, not guessed

Nobody knows what the manual version costs

Ask how long an invoice approval takes end to end and you get an estimate. The audit does not estimate: it times the steps, prices them at the loaded hourly rate, and multiplies by frequency.

Rankedby return, not by noise

The budget lands on the wrong workflow first

The most annoying process is rarely the most expensive one. Building the wrong thing first is how an automation budget produces a working system and no saving at all.

What lands

One document, four parts

Written so a developer who has never spoken to us can understand the workflow, the assumptions and the proposed build.

Process inventoryEvery workflow written down: what triggers it, who touches it, which tools it crosses, where it waits, and how often it runs. Handoffs included, because that is where most of the time actually goes.Completeinputs to outputs
Cost per processEach step timed and priced at your loaded rate, then multiplied by frequency. One table, one monthly figure per workflow, sortable by the only column that matters.Monthly $per workflow
The ranked roadmapAutomation targets ordered by return against effort. Each item shows what it would take to build, the estimated cost and the assumptions behind any projected saving.Orderedby ROI
What not to automateThe workflows where the manual version is cheaper than the system that would replace it. They stay in the roadmap with the reason they should be left alone.Explicitwith the reason
One example

A modeled audit, with the working shown

This fictional scenario demonstrates the calculation. Its inputs and outputs are examples, not client results, averages or forecasts.

8manual processes in the published direct-to-consumer modelillustrative scenario
$14,200modeled monthly cost of running those processes by handillustrative assumptions
3 → 25modeled publishing capacity before and after automationillustrative scenario
3 to 5 daysfrom the intake form to the finished document, on a fixed scheduledelivery target
The line

What it is, and what it is not

An audit that ends in a proposal for itself is a sales call with a document attached.

What the audit does
  • Documents every workflow end to end, handoffs and waiting time included
  • Times each step and prices it at your loaded hourly rate
  • Ranks automation targets by return against build effort
  • Names the workflows that are cheaper left alone, and why
  • Flags integration problems before anything is quoted
What it does not do
  • Build anything: that is quoted separately, and only if you want it
  • Require you to build with us for the document to be useful
  • Measure whether an AI assistant names you, which is a separate audit
  • Bill by the hour or move once the scope is agreed
  • Need meetings: the whole thing runs in writing
Buy it

One field, then a card

No call and no proposal. Tell us which company to look at and pay for it; the audit is written against that business and comes back in three to five days.

Paid once. The full $290 comes off the first invoice if you go on to build with us.

Three steps

Twenty minutes from you, five days from us

Asynchronous end to end. The only fixed cost on your side is the intake form.

You describe the workA written intake: what your team does, which tools it runs on, where you think the waste is, and what you have already tried. In writing, so nothing is lost to a call nobody took notes in.20 minutesyour side
We map and price itWorkflows documented, steps timed, costs calculated, targets ranked. Asynchronous, with follow-up questions in writing when a process is ambiguous rather than an assumption baked into the numbers.3 to 5 daysour side
You decide what happensBuild it with us, build it in-house from the roadmap, or shelve it. The document is the same either way, and it is written to be usable by a developer who has never spoken to us.Your callno obligation
You are here

What your team does by hand

Hours, costs and a ranked plan for removing them. The audit for a business that already has customers and is drowning in the work of serving them.

The other one

What an AI says about you

Twenty to forty buying prompts across four assistants, scored, with the sources they cite mapped. The audit for a business that needs the customers in the first place.

See the visibility audit

Before you book

Price, deliverable, what happens to your stack and your data, and what the other audit is.

A structured document: the full process inventory, a cost table with a monthly figure per workflow, a roadmap ranked by return against effort, and an explicit list of what is not worth automating. Every recommendation carries an estimated saving and a rough build timeline.

A flat $290. If you go on to deploy a ready solution or a custom build with us, the full $290 comes off the first invoice. No hourly billing and no scope creep: the price is the price whether the audit takes three days or five.

Slack, Notion, HubSpot, Google Workspace, Salesforce, custom APIs and the legacy system nobody wants to touch. Where something cannot be integrated cleanly, the audit says so before any build work is quoted, which is the point of doing it first.

This audit measures what your team does by hand and what it costs. The $490 visibility audit records how configured AI model APIs answer buying questions about your business. Both return a written document within five business days, but the measurements do not overlap.

No. The document names the tools, integration points and estimated effort so your own team or another provider can work from it. Building with AIGrow is a separate decision.

Start with process descriptions and do not send credentials or raw customer records. Before sensitive data is needed, the written audit scope should name the provider, purpose, access and retention involved. Privacy requests go to [email protected].

Count it before you automate it.

Twenty minutes of writing, five days of work, and a document that tells you which workflow to fix first and what it is worth. If the honest answer is none of them, it says that too.

$290 · credited against any build · no retainer