Know what to automate before you pay to build it

Every workflow your team runs by hand, written down, timed and priced at what it costs a month. Then a roadmap ordered by return, so the first thing you build is the one that pays for the second.

Charged in US dollars at the price shown.

$49 once, credited in full against any build. Back within 5 working days. No retainer, no lock-in.

$14,200Process inventory, extractmodeled monthly cost across eight manual workflows

Order to fulfilment handoff: $3,400/mo
Weekly reporting pack: $2,900/mo
Content production: $2,750/mo
Four more, refunds included: $4,510/mo
Supplier onboarding, left alone: $640/mo
Eight workflows: $14,200/mo

Illustrative model, not a client result or forecast. The last row is deliberately left manual.

Three places worth measuring first

Recurring manual work often disappears into ordinary operations. The audit records the time and frequency before recommending a build.

Weekly

The same task, every week, forever

and never on a timesheet

Someone moves data between two tools by hand, rebuilds the same report every Monday, or answers the same twenty requests. Nobody logs it, because it is not a project. It is just how it is done.

Per task

Nobody knows what the manual version costs

measured, not guessed

Ask how long an invoice approval takes end to end and you get an estimate. The audit does not estimate: it times the steps, prices them at the loaded hourly rate, and multiplies by frequency.

Ranked

The budget lands on the wrong workflow first

by return, not by noise

The most annoying process is rarely the most expensive one. Building the wrong thing first is how an automation budget produces a working system and no saving at all.

One document, four parts

Written so a developer who has never spoken to us can understand the workflow, the assumptions and the proposed build.

Book the audit

Process inventoryEvery workflow written down: what triggers it, who touches it, which tools it crosses, where it waits, and how often it runs. Handoffs included, because that is where most of the time actually goes.Completeinputs to outputs

Cost per processEach step timed and priced at your loaded rate, then multiplied by frequency. One table, one monthly figure per workflow, sortable by the only column that matters.Monthly $per workflow

The ranked roadmapAutomation targets ordered by return against effort. Each item shows what it would take to build, the estimated cost and the assumptions behind any projected saving.Orderedby ROI

What not to automateThe workflows where the manual version is cheaper than the system that would replace it. They stay in the roadmap with the reason they should be left alone.Explicitwith the reason

A modeled audit, with the working shown

This fictional scenario demonstrates the calculation. Its inputs and outputs are examples, not client results, averages or forecasts.

Read the teardown

8manual processes in the published direct-to-consumer modelillustrative scenario

$14,200modeled monthly cost of running those processes by handillustrative assumptions

3 → 25modeled publishing capacity before and after automationillustrative scenario

5 working daysfrom the intake form to the finished document, on a fixed scheduledelivery target

What it is, and what it is not

An audit that ends in a proposal for itself is a sales call with a document attached.

What the audit does

Documents every workflow end to end, handoffs and waiting time included
Times each step and prices it at your loaded hourly rate
Ranks automation targets by return against build effort
Names the workflows that are cheaper left alone, and why
Flags integration problems before anything is quoted

What it does not do

Build anything: that is quoted separately, and only if you want it
Require you to build with us for the document to be useful
Measure whether an AI assistant names you, which is a separate audit
Bill by the hour or move once the scope is agreed
Need meetings: the whole thing runs in writing

Twenty minutes from you, five working days from us

Asynchronous end to end. The only fixed cost on your side is the intake form.

You describe the workA written intake: what your team does, which tools it runs on, where you think the waste is, and what you have already tried. In writing, so nothing is lost to a call nobody took notes in.20 minutesyour side

We map and price itWorkflows documented, steps timed, costs calculated, targets ranked. Asynchronous, with follow-up questions in writing when a process is ambiguous rather than an assumption baked into the numbers.Up to 5 working daysour side

You decide what happensBuild it with us, build it in-house from the roadmap, or shelve it. The document is the same either way, and it is written to be usable by a developer who has never spoken to us.Your callno obligation

What your team does by hand

You are here

Hours, costs and a ranked plan for removing them. The audit for a business that already has customers and is drowning in the work of serving them.

What an AI says about you

The other one

Twenty to forty buying prompts across four assistants, scored, with the competitors they name instead of you. The audit for a business that needs the customers in the first place.

See the visibility audit

Before you book

Price, deliverable, what happens to your stack and your data, and what the other audit is.

See what gets built afterwards

A structured document: the full process inventory, a cost table with a monthly figure per workflow, a roadmap ranked by return against effort, and an explicit list of what is not worth automating. Every recommendation carries an estimated saving and a rough build timeline.

A flat $49. If you go on to deploy a ready solution or a custom build with us, the full $49 comes off the first invoice. No hourly billing and no scope creep: the price is the price whether the audit takes three days or five.

Slack, Notion, HubSpot, Google Workspace, Salesforce, custom APIs and the legacy system nobody wants to touch. Where something cannot be integrated cleanly, the audit says so before any build work is quoted, which is the point of doing it first.

This audit measures what your team does by hand and what it costs. The $190 visibility audit records how configured AI model APIs answer buying questions about your business. Both return a written document within five working days, but the measurements do not overlap.

No. The document names the tools, integration points and estimated effort so your own team or another provider can work from it. Building with AIGROW is a separate decision.

Start with process descriptions and do not send credentials or raw customer records. Before sensitive data is needed, the written audit scope should name the provider, purpose, access and retention involved. Privacy requests go to privacy@aigrow.gg.

Count it before you automate it.

Twenty minutes of writing, five working days of work, and a document that tells you which workflow to fix first and what it is worth. If the honest answer is none of them, it says that too.

Buy the audit See what a build costs

$49 · credited against any build · no retainer