AIGROW vs Conductor for AI search visibility

Compare a monitoring plan with fixes done for you and an enterprise platform for AI search and SEO. Both check what AI assistants say about a business.

Product pages checked on 5 November 2026.

2The shortlistproducts, each with a different job
Evidence
official sources
Selection
by use case
Performance scores
none
Publisher
AIGROW
A documented comparison. No paid-account testing.

Conductor is an enterprise AEO and SEO platform. Its AI Search Performance feature tracks mentions, citations, sentiment and share of voice on engines its page names as ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews, next to search visibility, website analytics and AI writing drafts. It publishes no prices: Growth is sold through a demo and Enterprise through sales, with AI tracking priced by usage. AIGROW checks your own buyer questions on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok, in any of 11 languages, at a published monthly price, and can do the fixes as fixed-price jobs.

Which one fits your work?

Choose AIGROW when you want your own buyer questions checked in your language at a flat monthly price you can see before you buy, with the fixes done for you. Choose Conductor when an enterprise team wants AI visibility, search visibility, analytics from GA4 or Adobe and content drafts in one platform across many pages and sites, and is ready to buy through a demo or sales.

Keep Conductor if your SEO and content teams already work in it. AIGROW can sit beside it for a fixed-price job such as listings on the sites assistants read.

Check the current product: Conductor. Checked on 5 November 2026.

What each one costs

Their published prices against ours. Where a plan is quote-only on either side, the row says that instead of guessing.

What you buyAIGROWConductor
Entry planWatch, $19 a month: 10 questions checked monthlyEssentials, price not published: 500 tracked keywords, 5 competitors, 3 websites
Mid planAct, $49 a month: 30 questions weekly, 3 competitorsGrowth, price not published, by demo request: 2,500 AI search credits a year, 5,000 keywords, 25 competitors
More sites or brandsOperate, $149 a month: 3 sites, 5 competitors eachEnterprise, quoted by sales: custom AI search credits, 10+ websites, role-based permissions
How the price is setA flat monthly price for a set number of questionsBy usage, in AI search credits; the pricing page shows no figures
AI enginesChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok on every planChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews named, with no full list
Languages and placesOne of 11 languages per market, with an optional placeTracking set by brand, region and domain; languages not listed
Making the fixesFixes done for you as fixed-price jobsAI writing drafts in Creator, 180 a year on Growth, used by your team

Conductor publishes no prices: on 5 November 2026, its pricing page asked buyers to request a demo or contact sales. Ask it for a quote before you decide.

What each option is for

Read the job, the documented strengths and the limitation before trying a tool.

AIGROW

Monitoring of your buyer questions, with fixes done for you when you want them

Visit AIGROW

AIGROW monitoring plans put your buyer questions to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok through their model APIs and save every answer, with the businesses each one names. Watch checks 10 questions a month for one site; Act checks 30 questions a week and tracks 3 competitors; Operate covers 3 sites with 5 competitors each. A site’s questions can be split into markets, each in one of 11 languages with an optional place. Fixes such as listings, schema or a Google Business Profile are separate jobs at a fixed price.

Best reason to choose it
A stronger fit for a local business or a small agency that wants a short list of buyer questions checked in its own language, at a flat monthly price, with the option to have the fixes done.
Check before you choose
AIGROW reads four assistants through their APIs, so answers in a public app can differ with location, account and date. It does not track Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode or Copilot, and no tool can guarantee a mention.

Sources: AIGROW plans, AI brand monitoring, Done-for-you services. Checked on 5 November 2026.

Conductor

An enterprise AEO and SEO platform, with AI search tracking priced by usage

Visit Conductor

Conductor sells one platform for AI search and traditional SEO: Intelligence for visibility in AI and traditional search, with website analytics, Creator for AI writing drafts, Monitoring for website health and AgentStack for LLMs, apps and agents. Its AI Search Performance feature tracks brand mentions, citations, sentiment and share of voice, and its page names ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews among the engines it covers. Prompts are generated by buyer persona and intent, tracking can be set by brand, region and domain, and a Recommendation Share score rates how strongly each answer recommends a brand. Its FAQ says it collects AI data through official APIs wherever possible. Growth lists 2,500 AI search credits a year, 5,000 tracked keywords and 25 tracked competitors.

Best reason to choose it
A stronger fit for an enterprise team that wants AI visibility, rankings, website analytics from GA4 or Adobe and content drafts in one platform, across many pages and sites, with SSO and enterprise security.
Check before you choose
The pricing page shows no prices: Growth is sold through a demo request and Enterprise through sales, and its FAQ says AI Search Performance is priced by usage in credits. Its pages name three AI engines without a full list and do not say which languages it tracks.

Sources: Conductor pricing, Conductor AI Search Performance, Conductor Intelligence. Checked on 5 November 2026.

How we made this comparison

Published by AIGROW, which is included in this guide. We reviewed public product pages, pricing pages and help documentation, not paid accounts, and each profile shows the date we checked it. The roundup lists tools alphabetically, with no overall ranking or performance score. Recommendations are our assessment of fit, not hands-on benchmarks. Features and access can change; confirm requirements with each provider.

For a useful trial, use the same business, buyer questions, country and language. Inspect the answers and cited pages where available. Keep the date and collection settings with your results.

Compare your shortlist

A direct comparison and alternatives for each of these platforms.

Best AI visibility tools in 2026

Before choosing a tool

No. Conductor’s pricing page lists Essentials, Growth and Enterprise without prices, with Growth sold through a demo request and Enterprise through sales. Its AI Search Performance page says access is priced by usage in credits, and the pricing page lists 2,500 AI search credits a year on Growth. AIGROW plans have a flat monthly price for a set number of your buyer questions.

Conductor’s AI Search Performance page names ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews among the engines it covers, without a full list. Its FAQ says it collects AI data through official APIs wherever possible, with prompts generated by buyer persona and intent. AIGROW plans check ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok through their model APIs.

No. A tool can measure sampled answers, identify issues or help you plan changes. It does not control what an assistant recommends. Track whether relevant answers change after the work, and record the questions, settings and dates used.

Use one real client, a fixed set of buyer questions and an agreed reporting period. Check the raw responses, countries, languages, exports and account permissions you need. Ask who will implement changes after each report, and measure the time needed to produce a useful client update.

Start with your business

Run a free scan to see where your website stands. Read the findings, then check the current plans if you want ongoing account features.

A scan cannot guarantee an AI mention or ranking.