Quick answers

We help individuals and businesses learn, build, and earn with AI. From hands-on training to production-ready automation and custom AI systems.

Run the free scan

The scan is free, plans start at $29 a month, one-off audits are $290, and builds are priced to scope. The scan ends on one recommendation rather than a price list.

See the plans

Run the free scan. It reads your site, asks several AI assistants what your customers ask, and points you at one thing. No signup required, and it will tell you if you do not need us.

Start now

Yes. Reach out through our contact form or join our Discord community with 87K+ members for direct support.

Join Discord
AI visibility

AIGrow vs Peec AI

Peec is the best-built reporting layer in the category and the closest competitor on intent: its Actions feature ranks what to fix, which is more than most trackers do. The gap is the verb. Peec tells an agency what to prioritise and the agency does it; AiGrow does it. If you have a team to act on a priority list, Peec's reporting is stronger. If the list would sit unread, paying for the doing is the better trade.

Six engines, agency reporting and prioritised actions, priced for funded teams

AIGrow vs Peec AI
12features compared, with the cases they win named rather than buried
AIGrow covers
7 of 12
Peec AI covers
6 of 12
Pricing tiers, both sides
3
Migration cost
named below
Sponsored placement
none

Nothing on this page is paid for by anyone. Where they are the better answer, the row says so.

Feature by feature

What each one actually does

A plus is best in class, a tick is present, a dash is partial, a cross is absent. Where they have something we do not, the row says so.

FeatureAIGrowPeec AI
Answer engines monitoredPartialFour assistantsBest in classSix, no add-ons
Brand mentions separated from source citationsPartialBest in class
Prioritised list of what to fixYesTracked actions that carry an ageYesActions, priority ranked
The fixes carried out for youBest in classFrom Act upwardNoRecommends only
Review requests sent on your behalfYesNo
Pages published to your own siteYesTwo a month on ActNo
Free tier with no time limitBest in classThe scan stays freeNoSeven-day trial, card required
Looker Studio and BI exportNoYes
Multi-country reportingNoBest in class
Seats includedPartialBest in classUnlimited
Built for a business rather than an agencyBest in classNo
Automation built for you each monthYesOperate tierNo
Money

What each one costs

Their published prices against ours. Where a plan is quote-only on either side, the row says that instead of guessing.

TierAIGrowPeec AI
EntryFree scan, then $29/moFrom €89/mo
Working tier$99/mo (Act)Around €199/mo
Agency$799/mo, 25 sitesCustom, unlimited seats
The difference

Where we are not Peec AI

The parts that are structural rather than a feature gap they could close next quarter.

A priority list is not the work

Peec ranks what to fix, which is genuinely more useful than a raw dashboard. AiGrow takes the same ranking and executes against it: requests sent, pages published, records corrected. The difference matters most for the businesses least likely to have someone free to act.

Free means free, not seven days with a card

Peec asks for a card before you have seen anything. The AiGrow scan is a permanent free tier because one diagnosis is worth having on its own, and most businesses need that before they need monitoring.

Priced for the business, not the retainer

Peec is built for funded teams and agencies with multi-country reporting and unlimited seats. That is a real strength and a real price. A single business paying for itself gets more out of $29 a month spent on being measured and $99 on being fixed.

Identity, not only visibility

Being unrecognised and being outranked are different failures. Correcting the record assistants read when they resolve your name to somebody else is specific work, and it is work AiGrow performs rather than charts.

Switching from Peec AI

Migration, overlap, and the cases where staying where you are is the right answer.

At reporting, yes, and it is worth saying plainly: six engines against four, mentions cleanly separated from citations, Looker Studio export and multi-country breakdowns. If your output is a client report, Peec produces a better one. AiGrow is built to change the numbers rather than present them.

No, and the names make it confusing. Peec's Actions is a prioritised list of what you should fix. AiGrow's Act tier is the tier where we fix it: review requests sent and replies drafted, two pages published to your site, your identity corrected where models have it wrong. One is the instruction, the other is the execution.

Fewer engines and a smaller frozen question set, deliberately. Peec spends its price on coverage and reporting surface for teams that need both. AiGrow spends the difference on doing the work, which is the part a business without a marketing team cannot absorb itself.

If you want the best reporting for clients you already service, Peec. If you want to resell the remediation under your own name, AiGrow's Agency tier runs twenty-five sites at $799 a month with white-label reports. Some agencies will reasonably run both.

Not directly, because the question sets differ and a history is only comparable against a frozen set. AiGrow keeps history from your first reading onward, so the practical approach is to run the free scan now and let the series start while you decide.

Moving off Peec AI?

An audit maps what you run today and says which parts are worth moving, which are worth keeping where they are, and what the migration actually costs. It is $290 and it comes off the first invoice if you build with us.

$290 · credited against any build · no retainer