Quick answers

AIGrow provides AI visibility monitoring, a business assistant, blog publishing and scoped automation services. Start with the free scan to inspect the output before paying.

Run the free scan

The scan is free and monitoring plans start at $29 a month. The operations audit is $290, the visibility audit is $490, and custom builds receive a written price before work starts.

See the plans

Run the free scan. It reads your site, asks several AI assistants what your customers ask, and points you at one thing. No signup required, and it will tell you if you do not need us.

Start now

Yes. Use the contact form for product, billing, support or project questions. Describe the goal and the system involved so the first reply can be specific.

Contact AIGrow
AI Visibility Index · September 2026

Wedding photographers in Birmingham that AI assistants recommend

We asked ChatGPT and Claude the four questions a buyer asks when looking for wedding photographers in Birmingham, three times each, in English, and counted who they named. These are the businesses named in two or more of the 24 answers.

Names are printed as the assistants wrote them. We have not checked that any of them is good, open, or real.

Wedding photographers · Birmingham
25%of answers named Lemonade Pictures
Answers
24
Businesses named
47
Named only once
28
Named by 2+ assistants
14 of 19
Named again on a rerun
9%

Edition September 2026. Download the data

Asked for wedding photographers in Birmingham, ChatGPT and Claude most often named Lemonade Pictures (25% of answers), Birmingham Wedding Photographers (21%) and Andy Sidders Photography (21%). Across 24 answers they named 47 different businesses, 28 of them only once. Each of four buyer questions was asked three times, in English, in September 2026.

The ranking

Share is the fraction of the 24 answers that named a business. The range under it is a 95% confidence interval: where two ranges overlap, the gap between those businesses could be chance.

Wedding photographers in Birmingham named by AI assistants, September 2026
#BusinessShareChatGPTClaudeQuestionsAvg. position
1Lemonade Pictures25%95%: 12 to 45%25%25%3 of 42.7
2Birmingham Wedding Photographers21%95%: 9 to 41%33%8%2 of 41
3Andy Sidders Photography21%95%: 9 to 41%25%17%3 of 42.2
4The Curries Photography21%95%: 9 to 41%25%17%3 of 42.6
5Liam Collard Photography17%95%: 7 to 36%17%17%2 of 42
6York Place Studios13%95%: 4 to 31%8%17%2 of 41.7
7Emma-Jane Photography13%95%: 4 to 31%25%0%2 of 43.3
8Rebecca Carpenter Photography13%95%: 4 to 31%0%25%3 of 43.3
9Benjamin Toms Photography8%95%: 2 to 26%8%8%2 of 41
10Faze Photography8%95%: 2 to 26%8%8%2 of 41.5
11Anna Hardy Photography8%95%: 2 to 26%0%17%2 of 42
12The Birmingham Wedding Photographer8%95%: 2 to 26%17%0%1 of 42
13The Curries8%95%: 2 to 26%8%8%1 of 42
14The Fennells Photography8%95%: 2 to 26%8%8%1 of 42
15James Merrick Photography8%95%: 2 to 26%8%8%2 of 43
16Daffodil Waves Photography8%95%: 2 to 26%8%8%1 of 43.5
17J S Coates Wedding Photography8%95%: 2 to 26%17%0%2 of 43.5
18S2 Images8%95%: 2 to 26%8%8%2 of 43.5
19Miki Studios8%95%: 2 to 26%8%8%1 of 44

Each assistant column is the share of that assistant's own answers. Questions counts how many of the four produced the name at least once; position is where it came in the answer's list, 1 being first. 28 more names came up in a single answer and are counted above but not listed.

What each assistant said

The same questions, the same number of times, and often different names. Each column is one assistant's top five from the ranking above, with the share of its own answers that named them.

#ChatGPTClaude
1Birmingham Wedding Photographers33%Lemonade Pictures25%
2Lemonade Pictures25%Rebecca Carpenter Photography25%
3Andy Sidders Photography25%Andy Sidders Photography17%
4The Curries Photography25%The Curries Photography17%
5Emma-Jane Photography25%Liam Collard Photography17%

Named here? Put it on your site

Every business in the ranking was named in two or more answers. The badge says that and nothing more: no position, because the ranges above do not support one. It links back to this page, so anyone can check.

Named by AI assistants: Wedding photographers in Birmingham, AIGROW AI Visibility Index, September 2026
<a href="https://aigrow.gg/index/wedding-photographers/birmingham"><img src="https://aigrow.gg/badges/index/2026-09/wedding-photographers/birmingham.svg" width="312" height="100" alt="Named by AI assistants: Wedding photographers in Birmingham, AIGROW AI Visibility Index, September 2026"></a>

The questions

Asked word for word, three times each, to every assistant through its API. The prompt is the one the free scan uses. No web search, no location and no chat history, so every answer starts from the same place.

  1. 1Who is the best wedding photographer in Birmingham?
  2. 2I'm getting married in Birmingham next year. Which wedding photographers would you recommend?
  3. 3Which wedding photographer in Birmingham has a natural, documentary style?
  4. 4Which affordable wedding photographer in Birmingham would you recommend?

How to read this page

What it measures
Which names these models produce when asked cold, from what they learned in training. It is not a review, a rating or our recommendation, and a business missing here may simply be one the models were never shown.
Why the ranges matter
24 answers is a sample. Asked again next month, most shares will move by a few points; the ranges say how far they could move by chance alone.
One business, several spellings
Branches, legal suffixes and spellings of one business are merged, and the other spellings are printed under its name. Names that might be two businesses are kept apart.
A name is wrong
If a business here is closed, misnamed or yours and you want it removed, tell us. We correct or remove it when the page is next published.

Elsewhere in the Index

Wedding photographers elsewhere

Is your business on this list?

The free scan asks the same assistants the questions your customers ask, scores whether they name you, and lists who they name instead.

Edition September 2026 · data under CC BY 4.0