AI leaderboard · Spanish

Best AI in Spanish: 301 models ranked by blind votes

Prompts written in Spanish. Ranked by LMArena’s blind votes, every score with its margin of error and, beside it, the list price of each model on our price list.

Scores from LMArena, published 20 October 2026, under CC BY 4.0. Prices from each maker’s pricing page, read on 15 October 2026.

Top score
1505Claude Fable 5 (High) from Anthropic
Models ranked
301
Level with the leader
34
On our price list
1
Published
20 October 2026

Level: the votes cannot separate it from the leader.

On LMArena’s Spanish board, Claude Fable 5 (High) from Anthropic leads with 1505 points from 1,361 blind votes, published 20 October 2026. 33 other models are statistically level with it. None of the models it ranks has an API price on our list yet.

Best AI in Spanish

Prompts written in Spanish.

LMArena scores of 51 AI models, with their 95% intervals, votes and list prices
#ModelScoreVotesPer 1M tokens, in / out
1Claude Fable 5 (High)Anthropic150595% interval 1488 to 15211,361·
1Claude Fable 5.1 (Max)Anthropic150095% interval 1475 to 1526507·
1Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic149995% interval 1487 to 15112,889·
1Claude Opus 4.7 (High)Anthropic149895% interval 1484 to 15132,055·
1Gemini 4 Argon (High)Google149695% interval 1458 to 1534224·
1Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Meta149495% interval 1470 to 1518617·
1Claude Opus 5.5 (High)Anthropic149295% interval 1460 to 1524335·
1Claude Opus 4.6 (High)Anthropic149195% interval 1479 to 15042,809·
1Claude Opus 5 (Max)Anthropic149195% interval 1471 to 1511993·
1Muse Spark 1.2 (xHigh)Meta148995% interval 1457 to 1522308·
1Gemini 3.7 Flash (High)Google148995% interval 1469 to 1510928·
1GPT-5.5 InstantOpenAI148595% interval 1463 to 1507813·
1Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle148495% interval 1473 to 14944,141·
1Claude Opus 4.8 (High)Anthropic148195% interval 1466 to 14951,860·
1Claude Opus 5 (High)Anthropic148095% interval 1466 to 14952,042·
1Muse SparkMeta148095% interval 1453 to 1506520·
1Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Google147995% interval 1463 to 14961,425·
1Kimi K3 (Max)Moonshot AI · open weights147995% interval 1461 to 14981,059·
1GLM-5.2 (Max)Z.ai · open weights147995% interval 1463 to 14951,548·
1Gemini 3 FlashGoogle147895% interval 1459 to 14971,005·
1Claude Opus 4.5 (High, 32K, 20251101)Anthropic147795% interval 1459 to 14941,147·
1Gemini 3.6 Flash (High)Google147695% interval 1456 to 1496947·
1Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba147595% interval 1455 to 1495930·
1Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic147595% interval 1461 to 14892,093·
1Muse Spark 1.1Meta147495% interval 1458 to 14911,406·

Where the ranking comes from

The scores, intervals and ranks are LMArena’s. The prices are ours.

Blind votes
LMArena puts the same prompt to two anonymous models and asks the person who wrote it to pick the better answer. The votes place every model on one scale, where a gap of 100 points means the higher model wins about 64 times in 100.
Style control
The scores discount answer length and formatting, so a model does not climb by writing more or by adding headings and lists.
Shared ranks
A model’s rank is one plus the number of models whose whole 95% interval sits above its own. Models the votes cannot separate share a rank, which is why several can be first.
Settings
A model can appear more than once, at different reasoning settings: the line under its name gives the entry as LMArena lists it. Entries with web search switched on are a different product and carry no price.
Prices
The list price per million tokens from the maker’s own pricing page, read on 15 October 2026. It is a price per token, not per answer: a higher reasoning setting spends more tokens on the same question.

Source: LMArena, leaderboard dataset (revision 9041150e, published 20 October 2026), licensed under CC BY 4.0. We change no score: we add the prices and the links to our model pages.

What each of them costs to run

The price list works three everyday jobs on every model, and our own benchmark runs them on real business tasks to see which pass.

Scores published 20 October 2026