AI leaderboard · German

Best AI in German: 314 models ranked by blind votes

Prompts written in German. Ranked by LMArena’s blind votes, every score with its margin of error and, beside it, the list price of each model on our price list.

Scores from LMArena, published 20 October 2026, under CC BY 4.0. Prices from each maker’s pricing page, read on 15 October 2026.

Top score
1521Gemini 3 Pro from Google
Models ranked
314
Level with the leader
35
On our price list
1
Published
20 October 2026

Level: the votes cannot separate it from the leader.

On LMArena’s German board, Gemini 3 Pro from Google leads with 1521 points from 811 blind votes, published 20 October 2026. 34 other models are statistically level with it. None of the models it ranks has an API price on our list yet.

Best AI in German

Prompts written in German.

LMArena scores of 51 AI models, with their 95% intervals, votes and list prices
#ModelScoreVotesPer 1M tokens, in / out
1Gemini 3 ProGoogle152195% interval 1499 to 1543811·
1Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Meta151595% interval 1479 to 1550275·
1Muse SparkMeta151195% interval 1472 to 1551237·
1Claude Opus 5 (Max)Anthropic151095% interval 1484 to 1536570·
1Claude Opus 4.6 (High)Anthropic150695% interval 1489 to 15231,304·
1GPT-5.6 Sol (xHigh)OpenAI150695% interval 1482 to 1529658·
1Kimi K3 (Max)Moonshot AI · open weights150695% interval 1482 to 1529671·
1Claude Opus 4.7 (High)Anthropic150495% interval 1486 to 15231,021·
1Gemini 3.7 Flash (High)Google150295% interval 1474 to 1531440·
1Claude Fable 5 (High)Anthropic150195% interval 1478 to 1525667·
1GLM-5.3 (Max)Z.ai · open weights150195% interval 1471 to 1530382·
1Gemini 3 FlashGoogle149995% interval 1474 to 1524572·
1Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic149795% interval 1478 to 15161,040·
1DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910 (Max)DeepSeek · open weights149595% interval 1458 to 1531239·
1Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Google149495% interval 1470 to 1518640·
1Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle149395% interval 1479 to 15082,146·
1Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic149395% interval 1476 to 15101,354·
1Claude Opus 4.8 (High)Anthropic149295% interval 1473 to 15111,077·
1GPT-6 Astra (Max)OpenAI149295% interval 1450 to 1534198·
1Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium)Google149295% interval 1469 to 1514757·
1Claude Opus 5 (High)Anthropic149195% interval 1471 to 15101,074·
1GPT-5.5OpenAI149095% interval 1471 to 15091,113·
1Claude Fable 5.1 (Max)Anthropic149095% interval 1456 to 1524296·
1Grok 4.20 Beta 1xAI149095% interval 1462 to 1517444·
1Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Google148695% interval 1463 to 1508776·

Where the ranking comes from

The scores, intervals and ranks are LMArena’s. The prices are ours.

Blind votes
LMArena puts the same prompt to two anonymous models and asks the person who wrote it to pick the better answer. The votes place every model on one scale, where a gap of 100 points means the higher model wins about 64 times in 100.
Style control
The scores discount answer length and formatting, so a model does not climb by writing more or by adding headings and lists.
Shared ranks
A model’s rank is one plus the number of models whose whole 95% interval sits above its own. Models the votes cannot separate share a rank, which is why several can be first.
Settings
A model can appear more than once, at different reasoning settings: the line under its name gives the entry as LMArena lists it. Entries with web search switched on are a different product and carry no price.
Prices
The list price per million tokens from the maker’s own pricing page, read on 15 October 2026. It is a price per token, not per answer: a higher reasoning setting spends more tokens on the same question.

Source: LMArena, leaderboard dataset (revision 9041150e, published 20 October 2026), licensed under CC BY 4.0. We change no score: we add the prices and the links to our model pages.

What each of them costs to run

The price list works three everyday jobs on every model, and our own benchmark runs them on real business tasks to see which pass.

Scores published 20 October 2026