AI leaderboard · Polish

Best AI in Polish: 236 models ranked by blind votes

Prompts written in Polish. Ranked by LMArena’s blind votes, every score with its margin of error and, beside it, the list price of each model on our price list.

Scores from LMArena, published 20 October 2026, under CC BY 4.0. Prices from each maker’s pricing page, read on 15 October 2026.

Top score
1514Claude Fable 5.1 (Max) from Anthropic
Models ranked
236
Level with the leader
41
On our price list
1
Published
20 October 2026

Level: the votes cannot separate it from the leader.

On LMArena’s Polish board, Claude Fable 5.1 (Max) from Anthropic leads with 1514 points from 240 blind votes, published 20 October 2026. 40 other models are statistically level with it. None of the models it ranks has an API price on our list yet.

Best AI in Polish

Prompts written in Polish.

LMArena scores of 51 AI models, with their 95% intervals, votes and list prices
#ModelScoreVotesPer 1M tokens, in / out
1Claude Fable 5.1 (Max)Anthropic151495% interval 1477 to 1551240·
1Claude Fable 5 (High)Anthropic151395% interval 1491 to 1536646·
1Muse Spark 1.1Meta151195% interval 1488 to 1534671·
1Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Google150595% interval 1484 to 1527797·
1Gemini 3 ProGoogle150595% interval 1489 to 15221,356·
1Claude Opus 4.6 (High)Anthropic150395% interval 1488 to 15191,561·
1Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic150195% interval 1484 to 15191,122·
1Claude Opus 5 (Max)Anthropic150195% interval 1475 to 1526526·
1Claude Opus 5 (High)Anthropic150095% interval 1481 to 15201,009·
1Gemini 3.7 Flash (High)Google149995% interval 1472 to 1527453·
1GPT-5.6 Sol (xHigh)OpenAI149795% interval 1473 to 1520631·
1Gemini 3 FlashGoogle149695% interval 1477 to 1516972·
1Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium)Google149695% interval 1473 to 1519682·
1Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle149695% interval 1484 to 15082,473·
1Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic149595% interval 1480 to 15111,614·
1Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Google149595% interval 1470 to 1519596·
1Claude Opus 4.7 (High)Anthropic149195% interval 1473 to 15081,195·
1Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Meta148895% interval 1453 to 1524281·
1Dola Seed 2.0 ProByteDance148795% interval 1472 to 15031,646·
1Muse SparkMeta148695% interval 1452 to 1519312·
1Grok 4.1 (Thinking)xAI148695% interval 1472 to 15001,941·
1ERNIE-5.0-Preview (1203)Baidu148595% interval 1455 to 1515355·
1Claude Opus 4.8 (High)Anthropic148595% interval 1467 to 15031,075·
1Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic148495% interval 1467 to 15021,091·
1GPT-5.4 (High)OpenAI148395% interval 1466 to 15001,317·

Where the ranking comes from

The scores, intervals and ranks are LMArena’s. The prices are ours.

Blind votes
LMArena puts the same prompt to two anonymous models and asks the person who wrote it to pick the better answer. The votes place every model on one scale, where a gap of 100 points means the higher model wins about 64 times in 100.
Style control
The scores discount answer length and formatting, so a model does not climb by writing more or by adding headings and lists.
Shared ranks
A model’s rank is one plus the number of models whose whole 95% interval sits above its own. Models the votes cannot separate share a rank, which is why several can be first.
Settings
A model can appear more than once, at different reasoning settings: the line under its name gives the entry as LMArena lists it. Entries with web search switched on are a different product and carry no price.
Prices
The list price per million tokens from the maker’s own pricing page, read on 15 October 2026. It is a price per token, not per answer: a higher reasoning setting spends more tokens on the same question.

Source: LMArena, leaderboard dataset (revision 9041150e, published 20 October 2026), licensed under CC BY 4.0. We change no score: we add the prices and the links to our model pages.

What each of them costs to run

The price list works three everyday jobs on every model, and our own benchmark runs them on real business tasks to see which pass.

Scores published 20 October 2026