AI leaderboard · French

Best AI in French: 299 models ranked by blind votes

Prompts written in French. Ranked by LMArena’s blind votes, every score with its margin of error and, beside it, the list price of each model on our price list.

Scores from LMArena, published 20 October 2026, under CC BY 4.0. Prices from each maker’s pricing page, read on 15 October 2026.

Top score
1535Muse Wonder (Max) from Meta
Models ranked
299
Level with the leader
40
On our price list
1
Published
20 October 2026

Level: the votes cannot separate it from the leader.

On LMArena’s French board, Muse Wonder (Max) from Meta leads with 1535 points from 246 blind votes, published 20 October 2026. 39 other models are statistically level with it. None of the models it ranks has an API price on our list yet.

Best AI in French

Prompts written in French.

LMArena scores of 51 AI models, with their 95% intervals, votes and list prices
#ModelScoreVotesPer 1M tokens, in / out
1Muse Wonder (Max)Meta153595% interval 1497 to 1574246·
1Claude Fable 5 (High)Anthropic152495% interval 1507 to 15411,513·
1Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Meta152095% interval 1496 to 1545638·
1Muse SparkMeta152095% interval 1492 to 1549479·
1GLM-5.3 (Max)Z.ai · open weights151795% interval 1496 to 1539819·
1Claude Opus 4.7 (High)Anthropic151795% interval 1503 to 15312,296·
1Muse Spark 1.2 (xHigh)Meta151495% interval 1481 to 1548352·
1Claude Fable 5.1 (Max)Anthropic151395% interval 1486 to 1540551·
1Muse Spark 1.1Meta151395% interval 1496 to 15291,533·
1Gemini 3.6 Flash (High)Google151395% interval 1494 to 15311,149·
1Kimi K3 (Max)Moonshot AI · open weights151095% interval 1493 to 15281,305·
1Claude Opus 4.6 (High)Anthropic151095% interval 1496 to 15232,712·
1Claude Opus 4.7Anthropic150995% interval 1495 to 15232,378·
1Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh)Anthropic150895% interval 1475 to 1541321·
1Claude Opus 4.8 (High)Anthropic150795% interval 1493 to 15222,188·
1Gemini 3.7 Flash (High)Google150695% interval 1486 to 1527925·
1Gemini 3 ProGoogle150695% interval 1487 to 1526968·
1Claude Opus 5 (High)Anthropic150695% interval 1491 to 15212,185·
1GPT-5.6 Sol (xHigh)OpenAI150695% interval 1488 to 15231,373·
1Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic150695% interval 1492 to 15202,231·
1GPT-6.1 Sol (Max)OpenAI150695% interval 1471 to 1540303·
1Grok 4.20 Beta (Reasoning, 0309)xAI150395% interval 1489 to 15172,220·
1Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle150195% interval 1490 to 15134,283·
1GLM-5.3-FlashZ.ai · open weights150195% interval 1484 to 15191,348·
1Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba150195% interval 1482 to 15201,045·

Where the ranking comes from

The scores, intervals and ranks are LMArena’s. The prices are ours.

Blind votes
LMArena puts the same prompt to two anonymous models and asks the person who wrote it to pick the better answer. The votes place every model on one scale, where a gap of 100 points means the higher model wins about 64 times in 100.
Style control
The scores discount answer length and formatting, so a model does not climb by writing more or by adding headings and lists.
Shared ranks
A model’s rank is one plus the number of models whose whole 95% interval sits above its own. Models the votes cannot separate share a rank, which is why several can be first.
Settings
A model can appear more than once, at different reasoning settings: the line under its name gives the entry as LMArena lists it. Entries with web search switched on are a different product and carry no price.
Prices
The list price per million tokens from the maker’s own pricing page, read on 15 October 2026. It is a price per token, not per answer: a higher reasoning setting spends more tokens on the same question.

Source: LMArena, leaderboard dataset (revision 9041150e, published 20 October 2026), licensed under CC BY 4.0. We change no score: we add the prices and the links to our model pages.

What each of them costs to run

The price list works three everyday jobs on every model, and our own benchmark runs them on real business tasks to see which pass.

Scores published 20 October 2026